Bruno-The Gayest Movie of All

Megan Fox, Don't Ask Don't Tell, and now Bruno.

I saw the movie on Cinemax a few weeks ago. It was very disturbing, but I actually thought it was so appropriate in its depiction of what does happen when sexual perversion is unrestrained. There will be no respect for anyone. Man defies God, then what follows is man defies man. He destroys himself and others, mocking all decency, and wanting chaos as the new law of the land.

I felt extremely nauseated when Bruno did a cruel joke of pretending to seduce Ron Paul, by getting naked in a hotel room. Ron Paul was very serious in the interview he thought he could share his platform of changing the United States. Yet Bruno only gave him sheer disrespect, and needless to say, Ron Paul was enraged.

I understand that the movie is a mere parody of sorts. The primary intent of the movie is to expose the folly of homophobia, but what really happened is that it only exposed how homosexual excesses are disgusting. Another shocking moment was when a supposedly adopted baby by Bruno from Africa was in a picture (photoshopped I would hope) that showed Bruno and grown naked men in a jacuzzi. Bruno's answer when it was shown to in a talk show, and he was a guest where the audience was predominantly African American? This: he wanted to take his baby to places where he enjoyed himself sexually.

Of course Christianity takes certain stage as a source of defilement. The adopted baby was also in a picture, hanging on the Cross as the black Jesus crucified. Bruno also went to a place in Alabama, where there was a man (?pastor) who helped men deal and get out of their homosexual proclivity. The man shared the gospel to Bruno at one point. Bruno simply mocked him by saying he was turned on and he asked if the man was coming on to him. The man was shown with his face looking grimly silent.

There are many more horrible examples, and I would think that a homosexual wanting some restraint and decency would openly distance himself from that movie. Yet the movie inadvertently shows that when the commandments of God are no longer obeyed, there is really no other restraint left that would compel men to obey what must be true. For who can honestly say Bruno is wrong in his priorities and delights? By what standard is he wrong? Says who? Says society, whose meandering rules change decade after decade? What if it can also be said that anyone who objects to Bruno is just being another prude?

Jaime